Valvular & systemic infection

Endocarditis claims in clinical negligence.

Expert witness reports on missed or delayed diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Claims typically arise where failure to recognise fever, new murmur or embolic phenomena led to valvular destruction, systemic embolisation or death.

  • Missed endocarditis diagnosis
  • Delayed endocarditis treatment
  • Endocarditis prophylaxis
  • Valve endocarditis claims
what we cover

The condition and the legal questions it raises.

Infective endocarditis is a microbial infection of the endocardial surface, typically involving heart valves. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical to prevent valvular destruction, systemic embolisation and death. Cases typically turn on whether the clinical presentation — fever, new murmur, embolic phenomena — was recognised and acted on in accordance with current guidance.

Most instructions arise where the clinical decisions are tested against current NICE sepsis guidance and the ESC guidelines on infective endocarditis. These standards set the threshold for blood cultures, transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography, and timely referral to cardiology or infectious diseases.

  • Breach questions typically address whether the presentation warranted blood cultures, echocardiography and specialist referral within the timeframe set by the guidance.
  • Causation questions turn on whether earlier diagnosis and treatment would, on the balance of probabilities, have prevented valvular destruction, systemic embolisation or death, with material contribution analysis where pre-existing valvular disease is in issue.
  • Prophylaxis questions arise where antibiotic prophylaxis was indicated but not administered before dental or surgical procedures in high-risk patients, against the ESC recommendations.
  • Inquests may require expert evidence where the death was sudden and unexpected and the question is whether infective endocarditis contributed.
Clinical scope

The clinical questions our cardiologists answer.

Reports address the cardiology decisions in issue against current guidance and the Bolam and Bolitho standard.

Included in scope

Questions addressed

  • Whether the clinical presentation — fever, new murmur, embolic phenomena — met the threshold for blood cultures and echocardiography under current NICE and ESC guidance.
  • Whether transthoracic or transoesophageal echocardiography was appropriately requested and acted on within guideline timeframes.
  • Whether specialist referral to cardiology or infectious diseases was made within a reasonable timeframe given the clinical features.
  • Whether antibiotic prophylaxis was indicated and administered before dental or surgical procedures in high-risk patients, in line with the ESC recommendations.
  • Whether, on the balance of probabilities, earlier diagnosis and treatment would have prevented valvular destruction, systemic embolisation or death.
Out of scope

Not covered without separate instruction

  • Interventional or surgical technique during valve surgery or percutaneous valve repair, which sits with interventional cardiology or cardiac surgery instruction.
  • Infectious diseases management of antibiotic regimens, which requires separate instruction from an infectious diseases expert.
  • Examination of the claimant or prognosis evaluation, which requires a separate condition and prognosis report.
  • Quantum, life expectancy and care needs, addressed through dedicated reports where the case progresses to that stage.
Common cases

Common scenarios we report on.

These patterns recur in infective endocarditis claims. Most turn on primary care or emergency department recognition of the clinical presentation, with causation tested against the likely effect of timely intervention.

  • Primary care · Fever & murmur

    Missed endocarditis in primary care

    Patient presented with fever, malaise and a new cardiac murmur. Blood cultures and echocardiography were not requested. Subsequent valvular destruction and systemic embolisation followed. The report addresses whether the presentation met the threshold for investigation under the relevant NICE and ESC standards.

    Often paired with: Breach of Duty Causation

  • A&E · Sepsis pathway

    Delayed endocarditis diagnosis in A&E

    Patient presented with fever, raised inflammatory markers and a new murmur. The sepsis pathway was followed but infective endocarditis was not considered; echocardiography was not performed. The report examines whether the presentation warranted echocardiography and specialist referral.

    Often paired with: Breach of Duty Causation

  • Dental · Prophylaxis

    Endocarditis prophylaxis not administered

    High-risk patient with known valvular disease underwent dental extraction without antibiotic prophylaxis. Infective endocarditis followed. The report addresses whether prophylaxis was indicated under the ESC recommendations and whether its administration would, on balance, have prevented the infection.

    Often paired with: Screening & Merits Breach of Duty

  • Fatal · Inquest

    Sudden death from undiagnosed endocarditis

    Patient presented with fever and malaise but no murmur was detected. Sudden death followed from valvular destruction or embolic stroke. The report tests whether the presentation warranted further investigation and whether earlier diagnosis would, on the balance of probabilities, have prevented the fatal event.

    Often paired with: Causation Condition & Prognosis

Approaching a deadline?

Instruct an expert in endocarditis claims.

Send a short note on the alleged failings with the records bundle. Quotation returned the same working day; fast-track available where the trial window or limitation deadline requires it.

GMC-registered consultants Fixed fee where the bundle allows LAA rates available